Download Festival is being turned into an authoritarian nightmare by Leicestershire police

I’ve dedicated a large number of my blogs on festivals especially Glastonbury and Reading, but Download Festival isn’t one I’ve been to, at least in this incarnation, but I have been to Donnington for a Monsters of Rock but more of that another time. This blog is about something less fun, and vastly concerning to anyone worried about civil liberties and abuse of police power in an increasing surveillance state.

The Register has a story about the use of facial recognition software and surveillance of people via the RFID wristbands festival goers will have this year. It points out just what this is all in aid of.

According to an interview with DC Kevin Walker, published in Police Oracle on Monday, “Strategically placed cameras will scan faces at the Download Festival site in Donington before comparing [them] with a database of custody images from across Europe.”

The Register has been told the database of “lawfully held European custody photos” is “a stand-alone database of legally held custody photographs drawn together with partners in Europol”.

In response to a freedom of information request we filed to Leicestershire Police in April asking whether NeoFace had, or could, utilise information received from outside of its custody database — making specific reference to SIS II — we were told: “NeoFace has been intentionally limited in scope to ensure that it only uses images held on our custody database. It is a stand-alone system that does not link with other national databases such as the PNC.”

So think about this for a minute. Festival goers are going to be scanned, and presumably checked to see if their face matches anyone of the police database. Now as good as this software is, it’s not 100% accurate so innocent people will suddenly be logged on the database by the police but that’s not the point. The point is the fact this breaks a right to privacy but as the Register points out…

We have also learned that the Police Oracle‘s publication of the interview has caused significant upset for management at Leicestershire Police, who did not want any advance publicity of their “new” surveillance project.

The public would have been informed that it had been placed under surveillance after the event had ended, presumably as part of a “you didn’t know, therefore it wasn’t intrusive”, justification for the scheme.

Leicestershire Police were going to tell nobody going to festival that they were having their faces scanned and their entire movements tracked until after the festival was over, and even then most people won’t have known.  Considering how some people like to keep their wristband on for months, even years after the festival, the police could effectively track these people for as long as the RFID chip lasted.So this weekend people are having their faces scanned, checked against a police database and their every movement tracked and they’ve not been told about it or asked to give their approval, and they could be tracked long after they return home.

I know they’ll be people saying ‘but if you’re innocent there’s nothing to worry about‘ but it’s another sign that under the Tories the UK is shifting to a ‘guilty until proven innocent’ mentality that chips away at one of our most basic freedoms. I’ve written to my MP in order to see if she can bring it up in the Commons and I suggest people do the same as if this becomes the norm not just at Download, but Reading, T in the Park and even Glastonbury then that’s effectively a surveillance state and we can’t  sit down and take it.

4 thoughts on “Download Festival is being turned into an authoritarian nightmare by Leicestershire police

  1. Hi,
    I’m not sure this story is true. Firstly the Download website states that the Dog tags did not have a GPS facility so they could not track your movements. They would be able to track you when you used your tag to buy food etc of course.

    With the facial recognition thing I am sure that this would require an authority under the Regulation Of Investigatory Powers Act (RIPA). That type of surveillance would be both covert and intrusive and in my view illegal.

    I think it might be worth writing to Leicestershire Police with a freedom of information request to ask them if they conducted this type of surveillance, what its purpose was and under what authority they acted.


  2. It’s true. The Register article I linked from was off the back of a FOI request. It’s now being followed up by at least two national papers I believe.

    Download do have some questions to answer as do Leicestershire police.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.