What I thought of DC Universe: Rebirth #1


It’s 2016, so it must be time for another DC Universe reboot, but this one masterminded by Geoff Johns brings back the hopeful, cheerier DC Universe that Johns apparently loves, ditching the dark, miserable one that Johns played such a major role in creating. Except as revealed in leaks last weekend, it’s nothing to do with Johns, or DC chief Dan Didio, or the miniseries Identity Crisis but rather it’s Watchmen (the book, and it’s creators Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons shoulder the blame according to this extraordinary comic)that  is the real smoking gun as to where DC went wrong over the last decade or so according to Johns and this already controversial comic.

Before getting stuck into Rebirth, it’s worth spending time having a wee recap of Identity Crisis. This was a 7-issue miniseries released in 2004 which was to redefine what DC’s superheroes were, so no longer were they these shining figures of hope, but instead they were darker, more ‘gritty’ and instead of fighting bad guys they were busy fighting each other. To make the point that the brighter days were over, Sue Dibney, wile of the Elongated Man and part of the jokey, fun Justice League International was raped by Dr. Light.


It’s clear what DC were doing here as this at the time was massively controversial, and although Identity Crisis sold,  it’s worth paying heed to the comments of creator Kyle Baker at the time.

BAKER: This is a business, and all this stuff revolves around giving people what they want to read. All of the trends that you see in comics are a direct response to sales. DC and Marvel do what sells, and they repeat what sells. If the Atom is a villain, it’s because audiences respond to superheroes that have turned into villains, and that’s what they want to read. We were talking about how you have to change things over the years. Everything is a response to trends; public fantasies change as a response to trends. Someone like Captain America is created as response to Nazism. He’s a fantasy of beating up the Nazis, a fantasy of America. You could probably sell a character like that today, but that character was created because of the times, and the fantasy that people were the hungriest for. Even the name “Plastic Man” — when Plastic Man was created, plastic was this new miracle polymer. All of the Marvel characters were created by radiation, and Iron Man’s superpower was transistors, because that was hot at the time. That was what had captured the public imagination. I think the last superhero fantasy that really grabbed the public that way was The Matrix. [laughs] That fantasy of breaking out of your shitty office job and fighting crime, instead of being some cog in a cubicle somewhere. That really resonated with people at the time.

So if people are fantasizing about their heroes becoming murderers, that’s just what’s in their heads right now. That’s what they want to see. That’s what they’re dreaming of.

FARAGO: Yeah, it’s, uh —

BAKER: Weird.

FARAGO: I thought the industry was moving away from it, and there were all these signs that people wanted the noble heroes again —

BAKER: Isn’t that [Identity Crisis] the biggest book of the year?

FARAGO: Yeah, easily.

BAKER: Every time people buy it, they’re going to do another one. That’s common sense. If the biggest book of the year features brutal rapes, you’re going to have to top it next time. You’re going to have to come up with, what’s worse than that? What’s worse than raping and killing a character’s wife? We’re going to have to top that. Maybe we can cut Lois Lane’s head off and shove it up her ass. That’s what’ll be at the next meeting. We’re going to have to figure out how to brutalize the rest of the DC universe.

And they did figure out how to brutalise the rest of the DC Universe (DCU) as it veered from one major event to another and the DCU five years ago went through the New 52 revamp which made all their heroes a bunch of pricks. Superman? Prick. Batman? Prick. Green Lantern? Prick. You get the jist…

Thing is the sales of Identity Crisis were never reached by DC by the time it got to the New 52, barring a few titles like Grant Morrison’s Superman stories in Action Comics. Even then the diminishing returns for moody, grim, violent rapey, angsty superheroes were minimal, especially with Marvel’s film arm producing bright, cheery heroes who save people and act generally like superheroes. So in 2016 we come to DC Universe: Rebirth where for the last decade and everything that happened in it is blamed on Dr. Manhattan from Watchmen who created the New 52 to see what a universe without hope is like. It’s been posited this is a ”gutsy work of comics criticism’, but that is frankly, a load of fucking shite. If it was Johns would turn this so-called criticism upon himself, and his superiors who for a decade have shaped the DCU into what it is now, not a comic produced 30 years ago that still makes DC money. Maybe it’s the fact it’s a constant reminder of what DC’s lost in terms of talent and prestige that clearly annoys Johns about Watchmen, I dunno, I don’t live in his head.

The comic itself makes it clear with it’s opening 9-panel grid opening page where it’s coming from and it’s a jarring sight, but unlike Grant Morrison’s Multiversity event last year, there’s no sign of Johns having read, or grasped what Watchmen was.


The disembodied narrator could be Johns himself speaking, and it probably is even if it’s odd that someone who helped get DC’s superhero titles in the mess they’re in is saying there’s ‘something missing’. As for the story, if you’re hoping to jump on board picking things up from scratch then forget it. This is a comic with three Jokers.


So this is a reboot not for new readers as such, but for older readers who’ve perhaps ditched DC and this is to attract them back, which if so, is extraordinary. Why not just wipe everything out and start again from scratch rather than make it needlessly convoluted in the first few pages for anyone that hasn’t a knowledge of 75 years of DC history?

Anyhow, the narrator is Wally West, former Flash but back in his Kid Flash outfit, and he’s touring the New 52 world trying to find a connection with someone to pull him out the Speed Force so he can return to this world and warn them of some threat or other. Frankly, it doesn’t really matter. The art is so painfully bland/awful/uninspiring and reeks of the conformity of the last decade of DC’s art by numbers policy that when added to a remarkable for all the wrong reasons script, this becomes a hard package to read if you’re not a serious DCU fanboy/girl. if you are then you’ll be glad to know everything is back. Even Crisis on Infinite Earths is back.


As said, new readers turn away now. This isn’t for you, this is for the people who lap up DC continuity like an alcoholic licking a spilled tin of Special Brew off a pavement.


That’s the hand of Dr Manhattan who is behind the darkening of the DCU, and as you can see in the dialogue, Johns is blaming the ‘darkness’ on one thing, and one thing alone and that’s Watchmen which is remarkable. Watchmen is a multi-tiered work that acts among other things as a criticism of the darker comics which were becoming more in vogue in the mid 1980’s, a fact Johns totally overlooks here. By the end of the book it’s dripping in hope with  a cautious note that the bad times always lurk round the corner. It’s a complete artistic work.

The New 52, and indeed, the last decade of DC is as said, the decision of a number of people who’ve looked at sales figures and decided rape, violence and ‘dark’ = money. It’s a decision of a large multinational corporation and a handful of it’s employees to impose a philosophy upon it’s comics because they think running a line of superhero comics can be done by committee and accountants. The creative instinct is suppressed to ensure creators create product, not art. What Johns should be railing at is DC’s consumerist obsession with marketing a superhero universe where everything is the same, rather than as it was previously, where there was a mix, something Johns hints is returning to the DCU which may in the long run be a good thing if it actually happens. Right now it’s a mess.


And indeed, since Watchmen DC’s taken the topic of darker superheroes on before, most notably with the excellent Kingdom Come series, but the deeper one gets into Rebirth the more insane the meta aspects become. None as much as the scene where Pandora, the character behind the New 52 is murdered by Dr Manhattan.


Subtlety isn’t a Johns strong point here.


That, if rumour is believed, is Ozymandias from Watchmen. Even John Constantine and Swamp Thing turn up in this jumbled, disjointed mess.


Then when you think it’s all coming to an end at last, Johns pisses in your face again as he hammers home the point that Watchmen was really miserable as far as he’s concerned and is responsible for dark superhero comics, Simon Cowell and cancer.


After the much publicised page of Batman holding up the Comedian’s smiley badge, there’s an epilogue where it’s driven home that now Watchmen is part of the DCU.


DC Universe: Rebirth takes a complicated mess of continuity and makes it worse. it throws in Watchmen as a scapegoat for a decade’s worth of bad corporate creative decisions in order I presume to absolve people like Johns from any sense of responsibility for what they’ve helped create. It takes one of mainstream comics best, most respected books, a book that changed comics, brought in tens of thousands of new, fresh readers and is still selling massive amounts 30 years after first publication, and crams it into a mess of a book in order to give it a kicking.

Yet by doing so Johns proves Alan Moore’s point that DC Comics are so creatively bankrupt they have to mine works he did three decades ago to help them sell comics. This also isn’t going to fill creators who may create new, exciting works with joy or confidence as after all, they’re seeing Geoff Johns metaphorically rub his balls all over Moore and Gibbons creation while shouting ‘IT’S ALL YOUR FAULT‘ loudly at the top of his lungs at a picture of Alan Moore he’s stuck on his bathroom mirror.

This doesn’t crap all over Watchmen as a work, because that’ll always be there, and anyhow, DC’s already done that with the inept Before Watchmen crap from a few years ago. What this does is show that Paul Levitz deserves much more praise for protecting Watchmen from this sort of exploitation as it protected not just it’s artistic integrity, but showed that although DC were bastards, they weren’t fucking bastards. They are now.

DC Universe: Rebirth is trying to have it’s cake, eat it, and after it’s thrown it up force it down your throat because it’s what you want, honest. Rather than do a flat out reboot it’s chucking everything in because one has to keep the hardcore continuity geeks happy, and fuck new readers. If they’re not up with seven decades of DC history then tough. Here’s a bit of New 52, here’s a bit of pre-Crisis, here’s a bit of something new, here’s some Vertigo. It’s all there. It’s all a mess. A fresh start will piss off the 30-50 year old core readership of DC Comics, but it clears everything out. It leaves a blank slate. It gives creators freedom, rather than have to throw in a mention of say, The Killing Joke, because going back in time to draw inspiration rather than try something different and new is all they know. Didio,Johns and the others making decisions at DC are locked into a spiral where after this they’ve left themselves with two options: to do a fresh start or fiddle round the edges yet again and lose readers til it’s just a small core of bitter fans clinging on because ”their” characters are what’s important to them.

In short. This is bollocks.

29 thoughts on “What I thought of DC Universe: Rebirth #1



  2. I’m not even going to try and argue with someone who has it in their head how much they hate something. I’m just going with I strongly disagree with you and leave it at that.


  3. I agree 100%. I just didn’t like anything New52 and this rebirth doesn’t fix a lot. There are a ton of series that are just remain bad.


  4. Pingback: Some of the reactions to DC Universe: Rebirth and Nazi Captain America is depressing | My Little Underground

  5. So basically, you reject Rebirth because Johns dumps on Watchmen instead of Identity Crisis, which you personally view as the apex of all filth. That says a lot about you, but not Rebirth. I agree it can’t work because the people staffing DC are the same editors and writers who have created all the muck of the last 10-30 years, but it’s impossible to take this seriously as criticism. It’s nothing but a crazy rant.


  6. Says person making a crazy rant.

    Perhaps you’d like a version in crayon to make it easier for you? It could have Superman fighting Doctor Manhattan down the side to make it exciting!!

    Liked by 2 people

  7. PG – It may say a lot about Glenn, but he’s hardly alone in preferring Watchmen to Identity Crisis. That’s a pretty standard and safe position, as one of them is widely recognized not only as a great comic but as a major work of literature, and the other, a decade on, looks roughly on track for the classic status shared by Zero Hour or Legends.

    Given that Rebirth seems to egregiously misunderstand Watchmen (the idea that Doctor Manhattan embodies corruption, apathy, and despair in explicit contrast to hope and love is complete nonsense) while blaming it for a wealth of developments in comics that Johns himself was heavily involved in, and that it does all of this while shamelessly repurposing the “everything you thought you knew is wrong” structure of Alan Moore’s “The Anatomy Lesson,” utter contempt seems an entirely reasonable reaction. The problem isn’t dumping on Watchmen – hell, Moore’s dumped on Watchmen. The problem is doing it badly and hypocritically.

    Liked by 3 people

  8. I make it pretty clear Phil that Identity Crisis is the root source of where I think DC went wrong, and indeed, so do many other which is I why I included the Kyle Baker quote from 12 years ago to make the point many people were looking at it thinking ‘fucking hell! Are DC really doing this?”

    It’s not the root cause of where things went wrong. That was in the editorial decisions that made IC what it was and the subsequent 12 years of DC producing ever worse superhero comics trying to work out why they didn’t sell.

    One of the oddest things about the reaction to those defending Rebirth is they don’t get what Watchmen was trying to say (and it had a lot to say) and the idea a 30 year old book is responsible for the editorial and creative decisions of the last decade.

    DC made a decision to go ‘darker’. It wasn’t Watchmen. It wasn’t Moore or Gibbons that did that. Yet in 2016 heres Johns making it clear where he thinks the blame lies.

    It’s bizarre stuff and the logistical knots people are getting into to defend DC is both hilarious and sad.

    Liked by 2 people

  9. No, it reads like criticism, which is what it is. A tantrum would be leaving a snippy comment about how you completely disagree or something and flouncing off without even attempting to explain.

    Liked by 2 people

  10. Care to explain how over 2k words is a ‘tantrum’ when I explain my thoughts in at times probably rambling detail?

    So what do you think? Do you think DC brutalised their comics after Identity Crisis? Do you think a decade plus of bad editorial and creative decisions has led to this half-arsed reboot? Do you think blaming Watchmen for the decisions of DC editorial is not just simplistic, but a gross misreading of Watchmen itself?

    What do you think? Do you have an informed opinion or are you just pissy because you don’t have one?

    Liked by 1 person

  11. Pingback: People finally realise that fandom is a bunch of sad, entitled dickheads | My Little Underground

  12. Pingback: What I thought of Titans: Rebirth #1 | My Little Underground

  13. Pingback: 375 ~ flusso d’incoscienza 217: prossimo progetto | il mondo di Kuroo

  14. Pingback: 378 ~ Addendum 3: Rimorte 01 | il mondo di Kuroo

  15. Pingback: 378 ~ Addendum 3: Rimorte 02 | il mondo di Kuroo

  16. I’m translating and not sure what does it “which if so, is extraordinary” means… Could you explain it in other words? PS: wiFe of Elongated Man


  17. Pingback: 379 ~ Addendum 3: Rimorte 03 | il mondo di Kuroo

  18. Pingback: 380 ~ Addendum 3: Rimorte 04 | il mondo di Kuroo

  19. Pingback: 381 ~ Addendum 3: Rimorte 05 | il mondo di Kuroo

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.