What I thought of The Hawk and the Dove #1

hawkanddove

Steve Ditko remains a genius even though a lot of his personal politics are not things I agree with. In fact Ditko’s politics it can be safely said are waaaaaaaaaaaaaaayyyy over to the right of mine, but his voice remains a fascinating voice as mainstream American superhero comics since the 1960’s has been dominated by a leftish-liberal (as in the American version) voice which at times has resulted in a blandness. Having genuinely original thinkers like Ditko, Steve Gerber, Alan Moore, Howard Chaykin or Frank Miller provides a variation to the muchness of mainstream superhero comics.

The Hawk and the Dove was one of the titles Ditko worked on when he arrived at DC Comics after his time at Marvel and Charlton, and in many ways it is pure Ditko. There’s the Hawk (Hank Hall), a brutal young man who’ll solve problems with his fists, and the Dove ( Don Hall, a pacifist) which allows Ditko to present his right wing views.

hawkanddove1

As seen in the panel above, Ditko is not fucking with us, or writer Steve Skeates who’d read the finest comic to see that Ditko had changed the entire script to make it fit his own philosophy so here’s the two heroes, one ready to kick arse, the other would rather not be there.

hawkanddove2

Hank turns into the Hawk in order to fight the baddies who are robbing his dad, while pacifist leftie Don stands cowering in the corner at the violence being committed towards his dad. Seeing as this came out in the middle of the Vietnam War and at a time in the 1960’s where the anti-war movement was growing having a jingoistic, gung-ho, right wing reactionary superhero was challenging to say the least.

hawkanddove3

Ditko can never be accused of subtlety. Don is a cowering spineless coward even when his brother is taking an absolute beating which isn’t hard to extrapolate that this is Ditko commenting on pacifism as a moral philosophy which is akin to selfish cowardice. This is brutal stuff, it’s wrong,  I hugely disagree but seeing Ditko’s views writ large in this story is challenging even 40 or so years later.

So, after taking a kicking from the Drop-Outs, Hank changes from the Hawk, when his father makes it clear he feels the Hawk is as bad as the robbers, something Don gloats about.

hawkanddove4

After setting this up Ditko then goes in for the kill.

hawkanddove5

Here Ditko presents Objectivism for the reader, the philosophy championed by Ayn Rand. This isn’t a case of moral grey, but black and white, A is A. Ditko then engages the reader in a debate as to whether vigilantism is right, or whether it’s the duty of any of us to step in when they see laws being broken. Effectively he’s questioning the entire reasoning of the superhero, as after all Batman and Spider-Man are essentially unelected,undemocratic forces of chaos unlike Don and Hank’s dad who is an elected force for order. There’s a hell of a lot Ditko’s forcing the reader to deal with here. Some of it is libertarian bollocks, but there are points which the right and the left have to deal with.

Eventually after several pages of moral angst from Don especially, Hank ends up going after the Drop-Outs himself, risking his life in the process. Thankfully though Don has see Ditko’s moral light via a little help with his powers.

hawkanddove6

Don won’t fight, he does however find ways to turn defensive moves into attack without throwing a punch.

hawkanddove7

After a fight where The Hawk and the Dove defeat the Drop-Outs, the revert back to being Don and Hank, and yes, here’s Ditko again making the debate perfectly clear.

hawkanddove8

This is brilliantly demented stuff. You will simply not find this level of politics in mainstream superhero comics today, and when liberalism is veered away from it’s either insane right wing polemics, or some leftish mush that slides back into liberalism. There’s a simplistic political nature of more writers today in superhero comics, so they may be of the left or at least, near where my own personal politics are but they’re not saying anything interesting. Ditko did, I don’t agree with some of it but looking back at this with 40 years worth of hindsight it’s a more sophisticated story that I thought it was when I read it a wee boy wanting to see big fights.

Ditko is one of the last figures from the classic American era of the comics medium, he’s pretty much the only one still self-publishing via Kick-Starter projects. Go search his stuff out, it is, interesting…

Advertisements

One thought on “What I thought of The Hawk and the Dove #1

  1. I’m pretty sure that the idea here was that neither Hank nor Don had it right, that there needed to be a balance between their two views. In fact, writer Alan Brennert makes this point explicitly when he wrote the Brave and the Bold issue with Batman and The Hawk and the Dove.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s